- Yes No * Is your course designed and developed using the RODP WebCT Format? (Any additional entries to the navigation bar have been added at the bottom, all icons have been selected from the rodp_images directory, page text is Verdana 10 pt.)
- Yes No * Is your course Syllabus developed using the RODP Template? (The instructor contact information refers to the reader to the instructor contact page rather than including specific information on the syllabus. No dates are listed in the syllabus.)

- Yes No * a. Expectations for student outcomes are clearly defined.
- Yes No * b. Instructions are clearly stated regarding course organization.
- Yes No * c. Instructor's information is generic in anticipation that the course may be used by multiples professors.
- Yes No * d. Grading procedures are clearly presented.
- Yes No * e. Textbook information is correct and posted.

- 1 2 3 9 * a. Orientation to specific features and procedures for this course.
- 1 2 3 9 * b. Ease of navigation within course.
- 1 2 3 9 * c. Ease of finding information within the course.
- 1 2 3 9 * d. Explanation of how assignments are to be submitted (email attachment or assignment drop box).
- 1 2 3 9 * e. External  links to the Internet should always open a new browser window.
- 1 2 3 9 * f.  Presentation of reading materials (recommended normal font for RODP is Verdana 10 pt.)
- 1 2 3 9 * g. Judicious use of graphics (e.g., support content, quality, appeal, ADA, download speeds). Every graphic has an ALT tag.
- 1 2 3 9 * h. Use of audio and visual (e.g., appropriate use; clarity, consistency, appeal). Every media clip has a alternative text equivalent.
- 1 2 3 9 * i.  Use of learner support features (e.g., help menus, glossary, calendar, search, etc.).
- 1 2 3 9 * j.  Course features are designed to meet the needs of individuals with disabilities.

Comments: please identify and rate any other features that are pertinent.

Assessment Scale:
1 = Appropriate
2 = Needs additional clarification / minor modifications (please note comments)
3 = Recommendation for improvement / enhancement before hosting (comments are requested)
9 = Not Observed/ Not Applicable (be sure to comment if you feel that this element or item should be present in the course)

- 1 2 3 9 * a. Interactivity of instructional activities (e.g., simulations, learner manipulation of variables, virtual labs etc.).
- 1 2 3 9 * b. Student interaction capabilities with other students (e.g., online threaded discussions, peer feedback, group/joint projects etc).
- 1 2 3 9 * c. Integration of other instructional components: Streaming Video, Flash, PowerPoint, Excel, etc. with course.
- 1 2 3 9 * d. Links to outside resources: libraries, resource centers, opportunities to network with subject matter experts, etc.
- 1 2 3 9 * e. Adaptability to different learning styles: use of multiple modalities, range of response styles, activities, etc.
- 1 2 3 9 * f.  Use of embedded assessment (i.e. integrated with instruction).
- 1 2 3 9 * g. A statement relative to instructor commitment to appropriate feedback and grading response times is included.
- 1 2 3 9 * h. Activities and assignments to promote the asynchronous format are included in course design.

Comments: please identify and rate any other features that are pertinent.