- Yes No Is your course designed and developed using the RODP WebCT Format? - Yes No Is your course Syllabus developed using the RODP Template?
- Yes No a. Expectations for student outcomes are clearly defined. - Yes No b. Instructions are clearly stated regarding course organization. - Yes No c. Instructor's information is clearly defined. - Yes No d. Grading procedures are clearly presented. - Yes No e. Textbook information is correct and posted.
- 1 2 3 9 a. Orientation to Web-based instruction included in course or linked to tutorial (provides introduction to the learner about use of on-line instruction, and about specific features, procedures, etc.). - 1 2 3 9 b. Ease of navigation within course. - 1 2 3 9 c. Ease of finding information within the course. - 1 2 3 9 d. Inclusion of instructions for uploading/downloading files and documents: (as required in the course for submitting course assignments) - 1 2 3 9 e. Ease of moving out of WebCT to the Internet (from hyperlinks inside the course) -- and the ease of returning back from the Internet to the course: Directions are noted to help the learner to understand that hyperlinks will take them out of the WebCT course and the directions to use the “back arrow or buttons” to return from the Internet to the course. - 1 2 3 9 f. Presentation of reading materials (recommended font for RODP is Arial 10 pt.) - 1 2 3 9 g. Judicious use of graphics (e.g., support content, quality, appeal, ADA, download speeds) - 1 2 3 9 h. Use of audio and visual (e.g., appropriate use; clarity, consistency, appeal): - 1 2 3 9 i. Use of learner support features (e.g., help menus, glossary, calendar, search, etc.). - 1 2 3 9 j. Course features are designed to meet the needs of individuals with disabilities.
Comments: please identify and rate any other features that are pertinent.
Assessment Scale: 1 = Appropriate 2 = Needs additional clarification / minor modifications (please note comments) 3 = Recommendation for improvement / enhancement before hosting (comments are requested) 9 = Not Observed/ Not Applicable (be sure to comment if you feel that this element or item should be present in the course)
- 1 2 3 9 a. Interactivity of instructional activities (e.g., simulations, learner manipulation of variables, virtual labs etc.). - 1 2 3 9 b. Student interaction capabilities with other students (e.g., online threaded discussions, peer feedback, group/joint projects etc). - 1 2 3 9 c. Integration of other instructional components: Streaming Video (not downloading), Flash, PowerPoint, Excel, etc. with course. - 1 2 3 9 d. Links to outside resources: libraries, resource centers, opportunities to network with subject matter experts, etc. - 1 2 3 9 e. Adaptability to different learning styles: use of multiple modalities, range of response styles, activities, etc. - 1 2 3 9 f. Use of embedded assessment (i.e. integrated with instruction). - 1 2 3 9 g. Instructor contact information is clearly stated, as well as, feedback and response times to students on course progress. - 1 2 3 9 h. Activities and assignments to promote the asynchronous format are included in course design.
Thank you for your feedback and suggestions. Your assessment information will be shared with the course developer for course enhancement. When you press submit this form will be sent to Dr. Robbie Kendall-Melton. This process will also display a printable copy for your records.